Implementation of the European Court of Human Rights case-law in Ukrainian judicial practice regarding compensation for damages caused by Russian aggression against Ukraine
pdf

Keywords

European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, implementation of the case-law of ECHR, armed conflict, compensation for damages, Russian aggression against Ukraine, judicial practice of Ukrainian courts, human rights

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and case-law of the European Court of Human Rights by Ukrainian Supreme Court in cases on compensation pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage by the State that was caused due to the Russian aggression. The special attention was paid to the approach of application of the Convention that was elaborated by the Supreme Court due to the lack of necessary compensation mechanism in Ukrainian legislation. The authors also drew attention to the references to the Conventio and ECHR legal positions within the explanation of limitation of judicial immunity

pdf

References

Council of Europe Office in Ukraine (2022), Round table ‘Court protection of property rights of
war-affected people’, June 20, 2022, https://www.coe.int/en/web/kyiv/-/round-table-courtprotection-
of-property-rights-of-war-affected-people- [access on: 01.06.2023].
Damages from Russia’s aggression: Ukrainian courts satisfied claims for UAH 173 million (2023),
“Suspilne”, January 30, 2023, https://suspilne.media/369498-zbitki-vid-agresii-rosii-ukrainskisudi-
zadovolnili-pozovi-na-173-mln-grn-opendatabot/> [access on: 15.06.2023].
European Court of Human Rights (2001), Judgement in case McElhinney v. Ireland, 21 November
21, 2001, Case No. 31253/96.
Gnatovskyy M., Ioffe Y. (2017), Twenty Years of the ECHR in Ukraine, “EJIL: Talk! Blog of the
European Journal of International Law”, September 18, 2017, https://www.ejiltalk.org/twentyyears-
of-the-echr-in-ukraine/ [access on: 05.05.2023].
Hristova H., Tralo Y., Buryakovska K. (2020), National case law on internal displacement: application
of Council of Europe standards, Pravo.
Hudyma D. (2022), Judicial protection of property rights of armed aggression’s victims: the practice of
the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court. Round Table ‘Judicial Protection of Property Rights of
Victims of Armed Aggression’, Office of the Council of Europe in Ukraine, June 17, 2022, Kyiv.
Paraskeva C. (2017), Protecting internally displaced persons under the European Convention on
Human Rights and other Council of Europe standards: A handbook, Council of Europe.
Shuklina N., Fuley T., Hristova H., Shumylo M., Fedorova A., Tralo Y. (2022), Judicial protection
of the rights of internally displaced persons and persons affected by military aggression against
Ukraine: Materials of the basic course for judges, The National School of Judges of Ukraine.
Stupak O. (2023), An effective mechanism for the execution of decisions on the recovery of compensation from the Russian Federation for the damage caused is needed, https://ct.pl.court.gov.ua/archive/1380513/ [access on: 08.06.2023].
Supreme Court of Ukraine (2019), Resolution of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, September 4, 2019, Case No. 265/6582/16-ц.
Supreme Court of Ukraine (2020), Resolution of the Supreme Court, May 13, 2020, Case No. 711/17/19.
Supreme Court of Ukraine (2022a), Resolution of the Supreme Court, April 14, 2022, Case No. 308/9708/19.
Supreme Court of Ukraine (2022b), Resolution of the Supreme Court, May 8, 2022, Case No. 760/17232/20-ц.
Supreme Court of Ukraine (2022c), Resolution of the Supreme Court, May 12, 2022, Case No. 635/6172/17.
Supreme Court of Ukraine (2022d), Resolution of the Supreme Court, June 14, 2022.
Zayets S., Lunova O., Fedorova A., Korkelia K., Khrystova G. (2019), Enhancing the National Legal Framework in Ukraine for Protecting the Human Rights of the Internally Displaced Persons. Revised Baseline Analysis, Kharkov.